Adirondack Rail-Trail: Railway Preservation Society Responds

49511What follows is a press release issued by the Adirondack Railway Preservation Society in response to a decision by the state to reopen the plans for the Adirondack Scenic Railroad route, formerly part of the New York Central Railroad, through the Adirondacks. The state acted following activism by the group Adirodnack Recreational Trail Advocates who seek to have the rails torn up for a rail-trail.

The New York State Department of Transportation (DOT) and Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) announced on June 6th that the State will initiate a public process to review the Unit Management Plan for the Remsen-Lake Placid Travel Corridor, part of the 141 miles of track on which the Adirondack Scenic Railroad operates.  Although the Railroad does not feel that revisiting the UMP is necessary in determining the future of the rail corridor, the Railroad remains confident that the State will once again determine the best use of this public asset is to maintain its designation as a multi-use corridor with a completed rail line and blended recreational and trail opportunities along the completed line.

For the past twenty years, the Adirondack Railway Preservation Society (ARPS, DBA: Adirondack Scenic Railroad) has enjoyed success as an important heritage tourism attraction as well as safe and successful rail operations. The railroad has served in excess of 1.2 million passengers and grosses $1,000,000 in annual ticket sales, facts which are reported to several federal agencies. As a multimodal corridor (rails with trails), rail use also allows for interface between the train, hikers, bikers and canoeists, making New York State a leader and world class example in this concept traversing a sensitive ecosystem.

The ARPS looks forward to working together with Commissioner Joe Martens (DEC) and Commissioner Joan McDonald (DOT) to study the impact of a completed rail connection between Utica and Lake Placid, an attractive option for individual travelers and for group tourism.  A completed rail line allows the Adirondack Scenic Railroad to carry riders on shorter excursions to communities and attractions along the entire corridor. The Railroad’s southern terminus in Utica connects to national rail and bus services, linking many otherwise isolated communities to larger metropolitan areas such as New York City, Boston, Chicago, and beyond.

The future of the Adirondack region depends on bringing people and business to the area from outside the Park and we cannot afford to eliminate any infrastructure which serves to attract tourists here. The Adirondack Park has thousands of miles of hiking, biking and snowmobile trails, many of which will be accessible via train with a completed rail line. The Adirondack Park has one railroad, a piece of living and functioning utilitarian history, a protected historic landmark, which allows people of all walks of life to experience the beauty and thrill of the region.

The Adirondack Scenic Railroad will continue to play a vital role in the tourism industry of the region. Destroying our past and limiting our future is not in the best interest of the region. Upon further examination of the corridor, the Railroad believes that its owner, New York State, will make a determination to complete rail restoration as they had planned to do twenty years ago.

4 thoughts on “Adirondack Rail-Trail: Railway Preservation Society Responds

  • November 30, -0001 at 12:00 am
    Permalink

    Those whining spoiled retreads of the 1960′s that never reached puberty are at it again with all of their distorted facts that communities on your line want an review of the use of the line in order to push their “Big Baby” mentality on you fine people after twenty years of proven performance and some time back ,their ecoterrorisim in sabotage of the locomotives and maybe some other equipment beacause, ” they want a rail trail”.It’s time to go back to fighting these overgrown “BRATS” to prove that a heritage railroad better than a trail!!
    Sincerely,
    Michael Thoma

    Reply
  • November 30, -0001 at 12:00 am
    Permalink

    Removal of the rails, closing this railroad, is a ludicrous idea. The anti-20th century intrusion squad have already destroyed so much, there is no reason whatever to remove these rails. Anyone who understands the economics and market share of this region knows that this silly and destructive proposal would hurt the economic wellbeing of everyone in the region.
    If you do not live AND work in this region, you do not have the right to propose removal of one of the most basic engines of the regional economy. I am willing to bet that the trails people are largely weekend visitors and residents, not people who need this transportation to make a living.

    Reply
  • November 30, -0001 at 12:00 am
    Permalink

    Those whining spoiled retreads of the 1960′s that never reached puberty are at it again with all of their distorted facts that communities on your line want an review of the use of the line in order to push their “Big Baby” mentality on you fine people after twenty years of proven performance and some time back ,their ecoterrorisim in sabotage of the locomotives and maybe some other equipment beacause, ” they want a rail trail”.It’s time to go back to fighting these overgrown “BRATS” to prove that a heritage railroad better than a trail!!
    Sincerely,
    Michael Thoma

    Reply
  • November 30, -0001 at 12:00 am
    Permalink

    Removal of the rails, closing this railroad, is a ludicrous idea. The anti-20th century intrusion squad have already destroyed so much, there is no reason whatever to remove these rails. Anyone who understands the economics and market share of this region knows that this silly and destructive proposal would hurt the economic wellbeing of everyone in the region.
    If you do not live AND work in this region, you do not have the right to propose removal of one of the most basic engines of the regional economy. I am willing to bet that the trails people are largely weekend visitors and residents, not people who need this transportation to make a living.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to michael thoma Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.